The Intel Kaby Lake-X i7 7740X and i5 7640X Review: The New Single-Threaded Champion, OC to 5GHz
by Ian Cutress on July 24, 2017 8:30 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
- Intel
- Kaby Lake
- X299
- Basin Falls
- Kaby Lake-X
- i7-7740X
- i5-7640X
Benchmarking Performance: CPU Legacy Tests
Our legacy tests represent benchmarks that were once at the height of their time. Some of these are industry standard synthetics, and we have data going back over 10 years. All of the data here has been rerun on Windows 10, and we plan to go back several generations of components to see how performance has evolved.
All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.
3D Particle Movement v1
3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. This is the original version, written in the style of a typical non-computer science student coding up an algorithm for their theoretical problem, and comes without any non-obvious optimizations not already performed by the compiler, such as false sharing.
CineBench 11.5 and 10
Cinebench is a widely known benchmarking tool for measuring performance relative to MAXON's animation software Cinema 4D. Cinebench has been optimized over a decade and focuses on purely CPU horsepower, meaning if there is a discrepancy in pure throughput characteristics, Cinebench is likely to show that discrepancy. Arguably other software doesn't make use of all the tools available, so the real world relevance might purely be academic, but given our large database of data for Cinebench it seems difficult to ignore a small five-minute test. We run the modern version 15 in this test, as well as the older 11.5 and 10 due to our back data.
x264 HD 3.0
Similarly, the x264 HD 3.0 package we use here is also kept for historic regressional data. The latest version is 5.0.1, and encodes a 1080p video clip into a high-quality x264 file. Version 3.0 only performs the same test on a 720p file, and in most circumstances the software performance hits its limit on high-end processors, but still works well for mainstream and low-end. Also, this version only takes a few minutes, whereas the latest can take over 90 minutes to run.
176 Comments
View All Comments
YukaKun - Monday, July 24, 2017 - link
Hat off to you, Mr Ian. A lot of good and interesting information there.Cheers!
Ian Cutress - Monday, July 24, 2017 - link
Thanks :) This will hopefully become the new CPU testing standard for us. It's all scripted, making benchmarking relatively easy. Sourcing and writing are now the mentally consuming parts.YukaKun - Monday, July 24, 2017 - link
That is nice to know. Will you write an article about the testing itself? Like detailing the process or something along those lines? It would be interesting to know about those little details, for sure!I'm sure you can glue together an article in no time! *wink wink*
Ian Cutress - Monday, July 24, 2017 - link
I've had one half-written about the new 2017 suite and an upcoming project for a couple of weeks. Need to get on it! Coffee time...Dr. Swag - Monday, July 24, 2017 - link
Let's hope you won't be Lake to the party...Cellar Door - Monday, July 24, 2017 - link
What is lake to the party is Intel - it is just so firetrucking sad how they refuse to give customers more for their money. HT should be enabled on all their chips, it is there on the physical chip.I will never buy another Intel cpu - what! You got a problem with that Intel?
leexgx - Monday, July 24, 2017 - link
Ryzen on some r3 cpus don't have SMTLolimaster - Tuesday, July 25, 2017 - link
With the corresponding price, Ryzen 1500X 4c/8t is 90% of the i7 7700 for half the price.Dr. Swag - Tuesday, July 25, 2017 - link
"With the corresponding price, Ryzen 1500X 4c/8t is 90% of the i7 7700 for half the price."This is just incorrect. Ryzen ipc is around 90% of kaby/skylake, but the 7700k oces around 25% higher and also has around a 20% higher out of the box frequency.
Diji1 - Wednesday, July 26, 2017 - link
Uh oh, now they have to swear to never buy an AMD chip ever ever!