Workstation Performance - SPECworkstation 3.1

SFF PCs traditionally do not lend themselves to workstation duties. However, a recent trend towards miniaturized workstations has been observed. While UCFF systems are still not capable enough to become workstations, the rapid performance improvements over the years has encouraged us to benchmark some of the systems for both content creation workloads as well as professional applications. Towards this, we processed the SPECworkstation 3.1 benchmark from SPEC.

The SPECworkstation 3.1 benchmark measures workstation performance based on a number of professional applications. It includes more than 140 tests based on 30 different workloads that exercise the CPU, graphics, I/O and memory hierarchy. These workloads fall into different categories.

  • Media and Entertainment (3D animation, rendering)
  • Product Development (CAD/CAM/CAE)
  • Life Sciences (medical, molecular)
  • Financial Services
  • Energy (oil and gas)
  • General Operations
  • GPU Compute

Individual scores are generated for each test and a composite score for each category is calculated based on a reference machine (HP Z240 tower workstation using an Intel E3-1240 v5 CPU, an AMD Radeon Pro WX3100 GPU, 16GB of DDR4-2133, and a SanDisk 512GB SSD). Official benchmark results generated automatically by the benchmark itself are linked in the table below for the systems being compared.

SPECworkstation 3.1 Official Results (2K)
ASRock NUC BOX-1360P-D5 (Performance) Run Summary
ASRock NUC BOX-1360P-D5 (Normal) Run Summary
ASRock 4X4 BOX-7735U (Performance) Run Summary
ASRock 4X4 BOX-7735U (Normal) Run Summary
Intel NUC13ANKi7 (Arena Canyon) Run Summary
ASRock NUC BOX-1260P Run Summary
ASRock 4X4 BOX-5800U (Performance) Run Summary
ASRock NUCS BOX-1360P-D4 Run Summary
Intel NUC12WSKi7 (Wall Street Canyon) Run Summary

Details of the tests in each category, as well as an overall comparison of the systems on a per-category basis are presented below.

Media and Entertainment

The Media and Entertainment category comprises of workloads from five distinct applications:

  • The Blender workload measures system performance for content creation using the open-source Blender application. Tests include rendering of scenes of varying complexity using the OpenGL and ray-tracing renderers.
  • The Handbrake workload uses the open-source Handbrake application to transcode a 4K H.264 file into a H.265 file at 4K and 2K resolutions using the CPU capabilities alone.
  • The LuxRender workload benchmarks the LuxCore physically based renderer using LuxMark.
  • The Maya workload uses the SPECviewperf 13 maya-05 viewset to replay traces generated using the Autodesk Maya 2017 application for 3D animation.
  • The 3ds Max workload uses the SPECviewperf 13 3dsmax-06 viewset to replay traces generated by Autodesk's 3ds Max 2016 using the default Nitrous DX11 driver. The workload represents system usage for 3D modeling tasks.

SPECworkstation 3.1 - Media and Entertainment

Product Development

The Product Development category comprises of eight distinct workloads:

  • The Rodinia (CFD) workload benchmarks a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) algorithm.
  • The WPCcfd workload benchmarks another CFD algorithm involving combustion and turbulence modeling.
  • The CalculiX workload uses the Calculix finite-element analysis program to model a jet engine turbine's internal temperature.
  • The Catia workload uses the catia-05 viewset from SPECviewperf 13 to replay traces generated by Dassault Systemes' CATIA V6 R2012 3D CAD application.
  • The Creo workload uses the creo-02 viewset from SPECviewperf 13 to replay traces generated by PTC's Creo, a 3D CAD application.
  • The NX workload uses the snx-03 viewset from SPECviewperf 13 to replay traces generated by the Siemens PLM NX 8.0 CAD/CAM/CAE application.
  • The Solidworks workload uses the sw-04 viewset from SPECviewperf 13 to replay traces generated by Dassault Systemes' SolidWorks 2013 SP1 CAD/CAE application.
  • The Showcase workload uses the showcase-02 viewset from SPECviewperf 13 to replay traces from Autodesk's Showcase 2013 3D visualization and presentation application

SPECworkstation 3.1 - Product Development

Life Sciences

The Life Sciences category comprises of four distinct test sets:

  • The LAMMPS set comprises of five tests simulating different molecular properties using the LAMMPS molecular dynamics simulator.
  • The NAMD set comprises of three tests simulating different molecular interactions.
  • The Rodinia (Life Sciences) set comprises of four tests - the Heartwall medical imaging algorithm, the Lavamd algorithm for calculation of particle potential and relocation in a 3D space due to mutual forces, the Hotspot algorithm to estimate processor temperature with thermal simulations, and the SRAD anisotropic diffusion algorithm for denoising.
  • The Medical workload uses the medical-02 viewset from SPECviewperf 13 to determine system performance for the Tuvok rendering core in the ImageVis3D volume visualization program.

SPECworkstation 3.1 - Life Sciences

Financial Services

The Financial Services workload set benchmarks the system for three popular algorithms used in the financial services industry - the Monte Carlo probability simulation for risk assessment and forecast modeling, the Black-Scholes pricing model, and the Binomial Options pricing model.

SPECworkstation 3 - Financial Services

Energy

The Energy category comprises of workloads simulating various algorithms used in the oil and gas industry:

  • The FFTW workload computes discrete Fourier transforms of large matrices.
  • The Convolution workload computes the convolution of a random 100x100 filter on a 400 megapixel image.
  • The SRMP workload processes the Surface-Related Multiples Prediction algorithm used in seismic data processing.
  • The Kirchhoff Migration workload processes an algorithm to calculate the back propogation of a seismic wavefield.
  • The Poisson workload takes advantage of the OpenMP multi-processing framework to solve the Poisson's equation.
  • The Energy workload uses the energy-02 viewset from SPECviewperf 13 to determine system performance for the open-source OPendTec seismic visualization application.

SPECworkstation 3 - Energy

General Operations

In the General Options category, the focus is on workloads from widely used applications in the workstation market:

  • The 7zip workload represents compression and decompression operations using the open-source 7zip file archiver program.
  • The Python workload benchmarks math operations using the numpy and scipy libraries along with other Python features.
  • The Octave workload performs math operations using the Octave programming language used in scientific computing.
  • The Storage workload evaluates the performance of the underlying storage device using transaction traces from multiple workstation applications.

SPECworkstation 3 - General Operations

GPU Compute

In the GPU Compute category, the focus is on workloads taking advantage of the GPU compute capabilities using either OpenCL or CUDA, as applicable:

  • The LuxRender benchmark is the same as the one seen in the media and entertainment category.
  • The Caffe benchmark measures the performance of the Caffe deep-learning framework.
  • The Folding@Home benchmark measures the performance of the system for distributed computing workloads focused on tasks such as protein folding and drug design.

We only process the OpenCL variants of the benchmark, as the CUDA version doesn't process correctly with default driver installs.

SPECworkstation 3 - GPU Compute

Overall, a large number of high-performance cores help the 4X4 BOX-7735U come out on top across almost all of the workload categories. Since these workloads demand sustained performance, the PL1 / PL2 tricks are not of much use. On the GPU compute side, Intel's iGPU fails on the caffe workload, causing the Intel-based mini-PCs to return abysmal scores for the component.

GPU Performance: Synthetic Benchmarks System Performance: Multi-Tasking
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • Grapple - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 - link

    Would love to see an Intel T-series (35W) processor SFF/UCFF in the comparison mix, such as the Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny or its predecessor, the P360 Tiny.
  • meacupla - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 - link

    It seems like it is only worth it, if it cost less than a 7735U or 7740U
  • nandnandnand - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    You mean 7840U. There is no 7740U.
  • meacupla - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    yeah, that one. I hate AMD's naming scheme. It's so confusing.
  • fallaha56 - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    Yes but the Zen4 7840U will destroy the Intel chip

    Odd not to see one of the many models of equivalent AMD NUC here…
  • sjkpublic@gmail.com - Thursday, July 20, 2023 - link

    The Intel version is roughly $200-300 more than a 7735U which is roughly equal in performance.
    I got tired of all the Intel microcode patches and went AMD. On top of that Intel has the ME which is not really needed for the single user and is another security hole.
  • Samus - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 - link

    It's good to see they took Thunderbolt into consideration here. That's a real oversight to this day on professional and enterprise products that annoys the crap out of me, ie, the Probook 450 G9 and 650 G9 are identical down to the case and internals except for one IC (Burnside) that adds TB4. PCIe 4.0 storage is nerfed in firmware on the 450 (limited to 3.0) but easily reactivated with a hex editor.

    The 650 model sells at a $300 MSRP markup over the nerfed 450. It's ridiculous.

    That said, if this thing has full TB4, it's strange they are using so much real estate for display ports when they could put 2x TB4 Type-C ports in their place offering substantially more capability. Throw in a $5 dongle for DP.
  • meacupla - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 - link

    USB-C to Displayport adapters are usually $15~20
  • Samus - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    $8 on Amazon, $10 for Lenovo branded one, and those are retail price. An OEM buying thousands in bulk will get them for a few bucks a pop. Not to mention the ports are cheaper and simpler to implement on a PCB over the higher pin count (and license requirements) or HDMI. The whole thing stinks like yesterdays diapers.
  • fallaha56 - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    Come on guys

    Any Zen4 7840U NUC will destroy the ‘cutting edge’ Intel chip here

    Let’s see one of the many models of equivalent AMD NUC reviewed…

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now